FirePro S7000 vs FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+216%
2432
FirePro W600
768
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
8
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
