FirePro S10000 Passive vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1762MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+25%
3405
RTX A400
2706
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8