FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (950MHz vs 928MHz)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3405
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+56%
5345
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
2880
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GK180
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1