FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon RX 560 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 560 896SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1175MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+61%
3405
Radeon RX 560 896SP
2106
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
45W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
