FirePro S10000 Passive vs FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (265W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+3%
3405
FirePro S7150 x2
3297
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
28
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
265W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Tonga
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
