Home Comparison FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce 6800

FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce 6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2004
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 6 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
300 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.900 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
NV41
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net