FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GT 620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+1165%
3405
GeForce GT 620
269
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
49W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GF108
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1