FirePro M4000 vs RTX A2000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
691
RTX A2000 Max Q
+794%
6180
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
GA107
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8