FirePro M4000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 565v
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 565v to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Mobility Radeon HD 565v 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
+59%
691
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
432
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
4
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
M96
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
M96 XT
(216-0729051)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
