FirePro M4000 vs Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
691
Arc Pro A60M
+670%
5325
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
DG2-256
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
