Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs TITAN Ada

FireGL V8650 vs TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
TITAN Ada +21013%
92900

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
320
Shading Units
18432
16
TMUs
576
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
AD102
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net