FireGL V8650 vs Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Radeon RX 5300
+952%
4632
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2020
FireGL
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
22
320
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Navi 14
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
