FireGL V8650 vs NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+1028%
440
NVS 300
39
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
18W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GT218
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
