Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X

FireGL V8650 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
19136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Radeon Instinct MI308X +18472%
81720

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM3
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
304
320
Shading Units
19456
16
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
153 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net