Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs MTT S70

FireGL V8650 vs MTT S70

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 7GB VRAM MTT S70 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S70 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (7GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (392.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
MTT S70 +2506%
11470

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireGL
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
7GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
224bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
392.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
224
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
358.4 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
358.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.94 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.47 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
179.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
22 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net