FireGL V8650 vs NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
NVS 810
+140%
1058
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GM107
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
