FireGL V8650 vs GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 6 PCI
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
2
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
560.0 MPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.120 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
NV44
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
3.0
