Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs FirePro V7900 SDI

FireGL V8650 vs FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
FirePro V7900 SDI +321%
1856

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
20
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cayman
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net