FireGL V8650 vs FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
FirePro V3900
+41%
624
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
6
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Turks
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
