Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs CMP 70HX

FireGL V8650 vs CMP 70HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
CMP 70HX +2334%
10710

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
167.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.71 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
167.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA104
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net