EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Opteron X1150
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz and Opteron X1150 with 4 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X1150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 200W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Kyoto
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
200 W
Power Consumption
17 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x73 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
48
Total Core Count
4
96
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
20.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-
