EPYC Embedded 8124P vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8124P with 16 cores 2.45GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8124P 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.45GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8124P
+113%
1677
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8124P
+259%
14324
Centaur CHA
3982
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
17.75 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
2x73 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.45 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.5
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
44
