Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+279%
52430
Arctic Sound 2T
13820
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
16384
Shading Units
7680
1024
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
120
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
500W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
100 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
