Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1160%
16790
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
