Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+2169%
3994
Quadro FX 1800
176
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
192bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
64
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
12
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G94
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
