CMP 170HX vs TITAN RTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 280W)
TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1770MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
TITAN RTX
+29%
16310
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Dec 2018
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
72
4480
Shading Units
4608
280
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
280
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
280W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU102
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
