CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 680
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1410MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Lower TDP (195W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+288%
12630
GeForce GTX 680
3250
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1536
280
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
195W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK104
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
