CMP 170HX vs T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
T400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1425MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+1054%
12630
T400
1094
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
6
4480
Shading Units
384
280
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU117
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
