CMP 170HX vs FirePro S10000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1410MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+270%
12630
FirePro S10000
3405
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Zaphod
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1