CMP 170HX vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (2175MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+111%
26730
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
160bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
48
4480
Shading Units
6144
280
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD104
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
