Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs Radeon R7 260X

CMP 170HX vs Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +540%
12630
Radeon R7 260X
1971

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
896
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
115W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Bonaire
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net