CMP 170HX vs Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+54%
12630
Radeon R9 Nano
8192
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Fiji
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3