CMP 170HX vs Radeon RX 590 GME
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1420MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+93%
12630
Radeon RX 590 GME
6543
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1257 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
2304
280
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Polaris 20
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR
(215-0910066)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
