CMP 170HX vs Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1410MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+683%
12630
Radeon R7 360
1613
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tobago
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3
