CMP 170HX vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1757MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+133%
12630
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
5398
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1187 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1757 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1536
280
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.22 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
168.7 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.80 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.398 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
337.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Navi 14
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
