CMP 170HX vs Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jul 2005
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
-
280
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
83W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
NV41
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0
