CMP 170HX vs FirePro W8100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+199%
12630
FirePro W8100
4219
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
2560
280
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
220W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Hawaii
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3