CMP 170HX vs FirePro W7100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+283%
12630
FirePro W7100
3297
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tonga
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3