CMP 170HX vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+58%
12630
FirePro S9300 X2
7987
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.0