CMP 170HX vs FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+1937%
12630
FirePro V4800
620
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
400
280
TMUs
20
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Redwood
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0