CMP 170HX vs GeForce 8800 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8800 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+3658%
12630
GeForce 8800 GT
336
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
14
4480
Shading Units
112
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G92
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
