CMP 170HX vs FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+896%
12630
FirePro W5000
1267
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
