CMP 170HX vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
A2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1770MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+178%
12630
A2
4531
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
10
4480
Shading Units
1280
280
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GA107
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
