Arc A380 vs FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+2815%
4198
FireGL V3600
144
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
