Arc A380 vs CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2050MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 185W)
CMP 40HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4198
CMP 40HX
+81%
7603
Blender
Arc A380
524
CMP 40HX
+124%
1174
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
36
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
288
8
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU106
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
