Arc A370M vs FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+143%
3174
FirePro M8900
1306
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
1024
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Blackcomb
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
