AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5625U
We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X with 24 cores 4.2GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 5625U with 6 cores 2.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4267)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 2.3GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (25W vs 350W)
Score
General Parameters
Jul 2025
Release Date
Jan 2022
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Shimada Peak
Core Architecture
Barcelo
AMD Socket sTR5
Socket
FP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 7
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 5 (Shimada Peak))
Generation
-
Package
33.26 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
350 W
Power Consumption
10-25 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
95 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
388 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
6
-
Performance Core Threads
12
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
24
Total Core Count
6
48
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
42.0
Multiplier
23x
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
1 TB
Max Memory Size
32 GB
4
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
-
Shader Units
448
-
Texture Units
28
-
Raster Operation Units
7
-
Power Consumption
10-45 W
-
Graphics Performance
1.108 TFLOPS
