AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Intel Celeron J3455E
We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X with 24 cores 4.2GHz and Intel Celeron J3455E with 4 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Intel Celeron J3455E 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (10W vs 350W)
Score
General Parameters
Jul 2025
Release Date
Jul 2019
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Shimada Peak
Core Architecture
Apollo Lake
-
Processor Number
J3455E
AMD Socket sTR5
Socket
BGA-1296
N/A
Integrated Graphics
HD Graphics 500
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 5 (Shimada Peak))
Generation
-
Package
33.26 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
350 W
Power Consumption
10 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
388 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
4
-
Performance Core Threads
4
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.3 GHz
24
Total Core Count
4
48
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
42.0
Multiplier
15x
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400
1 TB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
4
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
29.9 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
750 MHz
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
2.0
48
PCIe Lanes
6
