AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Opteron 144
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz and Opteron 144 with 1 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.8GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 90nm)
Lower TDP (55W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
+337%
874
Opteron 144
200
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
+1241%
5069
Opteron 144
378
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
San Diego
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Opteron (Venus (E4))
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
0.114 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
55 W
Power Consumption
85 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
213 mm²
Die Size
115 mm²
CPU Performance
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
1
16
Total Thread Count
1
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
9.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR1-400
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
-
32
PCIe Lanes
-
