A10G vs Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1710MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+3552%
31520
Quadro K620M
863
Blender
A10G
+4276%
3589
Quadro K620M
82
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
384
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GM108
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
